Cutting Comparison Chart

Comparing Features of Different Cutting Methods

Get Your Custom Solution

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Email*
Phone Number*
Comments
Accepted file types: pdf, dwg, dxf, stp, step, Max. file size: 50 MB.

Importance of Choosing the Right Cutting Method

Getting the results you need starts with choosing the right cutting method—one that ensures precision, protects material integrity, and boosts production efficiency. While methods like laser, EDM, and mechanical cutting have their benefits, they often fall short when it comes to precision, flexibility, or keeping the material in its original condition. Issues like heat distortion, inconsistent tolerances, and the creation of a Heat-Affected Zone (HAZ) can compromise both the quality of your parts and overall production performance. That’s where the Microwaterjet® process stands apart. As a non-thermal cutting solution, Microwaterjet® delivers tight tolerance cutting with no HAZ, no material deformation, and exceptional edge quality across a wide range of materials.

Explore the chart below to compare conventional cutting methods side by side and discover how Microwaterjet® continues to excel where others fall short.

Types of Precision Cutting Methods

Precision Cutting Methods Feature Comparison Table

Cutting Features

Microwaterjet Cutting

MACROWATERJET Cutting

Laser Cutting

Wire EDM Cutting

Chemical Etching

Ability to cut a wide range of materials – from rubber to hard alloys

Fast prototype capabilities

No thermal impact or heat affected zones

Can cut within a geometric tolerance of +/-0.01mm

No post processing required

No change in material structure

High cutting speed

High surface quality

Can cut a kerf width as narrow as 0.2mm

Minimal burr on the cutting edge

Just-in-time fabrication

Why Choose the Microwaterjet®

Ready to try a cutting technique with no post-processing or heat-affected zones? Fill out the form below so we can learn more about your project!